
The work provides a step towards chemical cognition in synthetic protocells and could be useful in biosensing and therapeutics.
Molecular computers made from DNA use programmable interactions between DNA strands to transform DNA inputs into coded outputs. However, DNA computers are slow because they operate in a chemical soup where they rely on random molecular diffusion to execute a computational step.
Assembling these processes inside artificial cell-like entities (protocells) capable of sending DNA input and output signals to each other would increase the speed of the molecular computations and protect the entrapped DNA strands from degradation by enzymes present in blood.
In a new study published today in the journal Nature Nanotechnology, a team led by Professor Stephen Mann from the University of Bristol's School of Chemistry and Professor Tom de Greef from the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Eindhoven University of Technology have developed a new approach called BIO-PC (Biomolecular Implementation Of Protocell communication) based on communities of semi-permeable capsules (proteinosomes) containing a diversity of DNA logic gates that together can be used for molecular sensing and computation.
Compartmentalisation increases the speed, modularity and designability of the computational circuits, reduces cross-talk between the DNA strands, and enables molecular circuits to function in serum.
This new approach lays the groundwork for using protocell communication platforms to bring embedded molecular control circuits closer to practical applications in biosensing and therapeutics.
Professor Mann, from the Bristol Centre for Protolife Research, said: "The ability to chemically communicate between smart artificial cells using DNA logic codes opens up new opportunities at the interface between unconventional computing and life-like microscale systems.
"This should bring molecular control circuits closer to practical applications and provide new insights into how protocells capable of information processing might have operated at the origin of life."
DNA-based communication in populations of synthetic protocells
Alex Joesaar, Shuo Yang, Bas Bögels, Ardjan van der Linden, Pascal Pieters, B. V. V. S. Pavan Kumar, Neil Dalchau, Andrew Phillips, Stephen Mann & Tom F. A. de Greef
Nature Nanotechnology (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41565-019-0399-9
University of Bristol
#Bionano #DNA #Computing #Biotechnology #Sensors
MMI Molecular Machines and Industries AG installed a CellCut system at the A.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences at the University of Eastern Finland in Kuopio on 21 and 22 October 2026.
A study led by Imperial College London compared five wastewater concentration methods. Nanotrap Microbiome A Particles showed the most consistent recovery across pathogens and the lowest equipment cost at approximately $8,200.

Mecwins has described its AVAC technology, which labels target proteins with plasmonic nanoparticles and counts each one individually by dark-field micro-spectrophotometry. The AVAC Analyzer reaches femtogram-range sensitivity.
This week in nanotech
$555M raised
5 funding rounds · 35 deals tracked
New products
Ti-WCMBN Nanomaterialia Featured
DLS-1 Mass Spectrometer for Fusion Gas AnalysisHiden Analytical Featured
Ionic® Purification SystemBionano Genomics, Inc.Market insights
Last 30 days: Quantum Technologies drew the most money: $2.15B.
Money raised per month
Behind the deal
Who invested in Universal Quantum’s $100M Series A?
See the investors with Insights Pro →